Review
of "Hardgainer Project X"
eBook By Jeff Anderson "The Muscle Nerd"
|
Training to build muscle mass
is one of THE primary reasons people get into training.
Yet in different people, the
same programs will bring drastically different degrees of
success. Some people look at a weight and just start piling
on muscle and strength. Not so for everybody, though.
I'm sure you're probably familiar
with the term "hardgainer"....basically, it's used
to describe people who have a hard time gaining muscle (ok,
not exactly a brilliant deduction, but that's what it means).
I'll be referring to this term throughout the review here.
|
 |
This is the target audience Jeff Anderson
is writing for in his new "Hardgainer Project X" manual.
And I do have to say, he has done an excellent job analyzing the
physiological reasons why certain people have a tough time gaining
muscle.
Even better, he's also addressed each
one of those physiological reasons with nutrition and training advice
designed to overcome those problems.
Let's take a closer look and see if
his approach holds water...
I'm going to go through a bit of Jeff's
reasoning here and give you my thoughts on the validity of a few
of the reasons he puts forward.
Reason #1 - Your "Fast Metabolism"
Though this might sound a bit trite
(after all, metabolism is always a buzz word that is frequently
misused), Jeff delves a little deeper to explain that "fast
metabolism" basically means "overactive sympathetic nervous
system"...which means the adrenal, thyroid and pituitary glands
(which control metabolism and energy production) are more active.
More active means more calories burned in everyday activities. Definitely
a valid reason holding back muscle growth.
Reason #2 - Catabolic Hormone Dominance
Cortisol is another buzzword that
is often misused but is a critical component of muscle-building,
in the way that it basically STOPS muscle-building. Hardgainers
tend to have higher levels of cortisol and, combined with the activity
of the glands described above, tend to react poorly to overly intense
or high-volume training.
Simply put, the ratio of testosterone
to cortisol needs to be fixed in order for a hardgainer to progress.
This point is very true as well.
Reason #3 - Muscle Fiber Dominance
It's a fact...some people have greater
numbers of endurance fibers (Type 1) compared to power-oriented
fibers (Type 2). When you have more Type 1 fibers, you're going
to have a tough time building muscle - this fiber type doesn't grow
very easily or respond very quickly.
VERY valid reason.
Jeff includes 4 other reasons for "hardgainer syndrome"
in his book (I won't dig into those right now)...suffice to say,
he's done his research and his reasoning does make sense.
So the next key is...drum roll please...does
his training program sufficiently address these reasons...enough
to promote muscle gain in a person who has extreme genetic disadvantages
to building substantial muscle.
The Hardgainer Solutions:
The nutrition section of this book
is going to be an eye-opener for many people. It goes beyond the
standard "eat more protein and calories" advice that you
generally see in magazines and books. Jeff has done his research
and has really put together an elegant nutritional approach, taking
advantage of your body's hormonal reactions to specific foods.
This is NOT all about quantity...ok,
it's a little about quantity, but it's about WHAT and WHEN you eat.
I like his approach with this...very doable and makes good sense.
When it comes to training, Jeff has
done a nice job of keeping the specific limitations of the hardgainer
in mind...training only 3 days a week is a big step because training
too frequently (no matter how much you enjoy) WILL kill progress,
even in non-hardgainers.
What really jumps out is Jeff's
interesting explanation of a technique he calls "neuromuscular
bridging."
And honestly, THIS section really
stands out to me because I hear echoes of Escalating Density Training
in it...managing fatigue and not pushing yourself to failure on
every set. He fully explains his reasoning in the book itself.
The way Jeff uses it in his program
is very good. I can definitely see the potential benefit of his
take on the volume vs intensity debate. It's certainly a technique
I can get behind and I'm glad to see it in his program.
The other thing I like to see? Jeff's
focus is on total workload on each training session and improving
that total workload to the next training session. This is also a
core premise of EDT.
Now, just to be clear, this training
is NOT a rip-off of EDT...it just uses some similar principles
that have been around far longer than even EDT has. It's sound training
and very effective not only for hardgainers but for easy gainers
as well!
In the book, you'll also find excellent
information on how to adjust the program to your own needs. Just
as not everybody gains muscle easily, every hardgainer isn't the
same either...some will need less or more, depending on how their
body reacts to the training and eating.
I have to say, overall, Jeff has done
a nice job with the training program...we don't agree on absolutely
everything (if we did, it would be a boring world, that's for sure)
but there is plenty in it where we're right there on the same page.
Supplements:
No muscle-building book would be complete
with out a section on supplements. What I really like about Jeff's
approach is that he has a firm handle on what supplements CAN actually
do for you...they don't GIVE you results...they can somewhat boost
your body's ability to recover and build from the proper training
and eating you're already doing.
To "supplement", as it were.
Imagine that.
His list of recommended supplements
is good - nothing radical...all based on sound science and research.
Conclusion:
If you're a hardgainer, looking for
an effective approach to building muscle, this is an approach I
can recommend.
The only major difference I can see
with us is philosophical...at Staley Training, we try to encourage
an athletic mindset...to have people think and train like athletes
in order to improve their physique as a consequence. Jeff's approach
is towards the physique side of things...still, the end results
speak for themselves.
Bottom line...good program.
|